Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE COLUMBA

IMO
9806055
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
115,233 t
Flag (estimated)
Japan
Port of registry
Tokyo
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.95 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 115,233 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
217
Container median 178 kg/nm (+22%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
5.96
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−69%)
Average speed
11.0 kn
Container median 13.6 kn (−19%)
Fuel per day at sea
57.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,332 t
CO₂ emitted
10,557 t
Distance sailed
15,371 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,391 h
58 days, 16% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 217 kg/nm · median 178 (+22%)
77.9Ranks 1,108 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.6 (−19%)
10.1Faster than 17% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−69%)
7.44Ranks 33 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports18%
  • From the EU2%
  • Into the EU76%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
519 t
4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ONE COLUMBA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • ONE COLUMBA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ONE COLUMBA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−0.9 kn−0%−7%+4%+5%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−3.1 kn−3%−23%−38%−3%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−1.7 kn−10%−19%−56%−16%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+1.0 kn+36%+45%+661%+26%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published3,33210,55715,3711,39111.02175.96–
2021not published3,21310,16814,8161,25011.92175.70–
2020not published5,31716,76323,8011,58515.02235.86–
2019not published13,62742,55054,6333,27216.72497.01–
2018not published1,3204,1107,18145915.71845.55–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published5.9619.1−69%33 of 1,825ClassNKC
2021not published5.7017.9−68%30 of 1,781ClassNKC
2020not published5.8617.6−67%50 of 1,797ClassNKC
2019not published7.0118.9−63%118 of 1,788ClassNKC
2018not published5.5520.2−73%3 of 1,705ClassNKC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.