Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BERGE PHAN XI PANG

IMO
9806299
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Douglas
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Berge Bulk Maritime Pte. Ltd

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
–
g CO₂/dwt·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 3,360 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.9 kg/nm · median 91.2 (−9%)
67.0Ranks 1,169 of 3,360, lowest first134.9
Average speedThis ship 5.9 kn · median 10.3 (−43%)
7.4Faster than 3% of bulk carrier ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.23 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.38 (+34%)
4.89Ranks 2,537 of 3,360, lowest first15.46
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • BERGE PHAN XI PANG
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • BERGE PHAN XI PANG
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BERGE PHAN XI PANG
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2025–––––
2018→2019−5.2 kn+34%−28%−92%+39%5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Berge Bulk Maritime Pte. Ltd00–0––––
2019not published1253921,5082545.982.911.23–
2018not published1,1963,74019,3321,73611.161.98.10–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Berge Bulk Maritime Pte. Ltd––––VerifaviaB
2019not published11.238.38+34%2,537 of 3,360VerifaviaB
2018not published8.108.50−5%1,536 of 3,384VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

BERGE PHAN XI PANG (IMO 9806299): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze