Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

TULIPA SEAWAYS

IMO: 9809100
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,822 t
Flag (estimated): Lithuania
Port of registry: Klaipeda
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,179 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

130

Ro-ro median 110 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

128

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.6 (+41%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

48.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,187 t

CO₂ emitted

22,417 t

Distance sailed

55,132 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,537 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 119 kg/nm · median 105 (+13%)

56.6Ranks 156 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

10.9Faster than 52% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 131 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+38%)

47.4Ranks 146 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU47%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

807 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TULIPA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TULIPA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TULIPA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

80.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	−7%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	+12%	+1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−11%	−15%	+5%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−6%	−14%	−32%	+39%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−0%	+7%	+28%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	+2%	+34%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	−0%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AB DFDS Seaways	7,156	22,343	60,354	4,136	14.6	119	131	–
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	7,873	24,569	64,801	4,411	14.7	122	134	–
2023	not published	6,672	20,790	57,652	3,844	15.0	116	133	–
2022	not published	7,187	22,417	55,132	3,537	15.6	130	128	–
2021	not published	11,192	35,082	80,865	4,751	17.0	138	92.3	–
2020	not published	8,774	27,340	63,117	3,988	15.8	139	108	–
2019	not published	8,461	26,364	61,887	3,852	16.1	137	80.8	–
2018	not published	8,648	26,944	61,934	3,776	16.4	140	82.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AB DFDS Seaways	131	95.2	+38%	146 of 235	DNV	B
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	134	97.5	+37%	141 of 220	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	133	109	+22%	131 of 221	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	128	90.6	+41%	148 of 223	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	92.3	104	−11%	94 of 219	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	108	103	+5%	127 of 238	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	80.8	90.9	−11%	107 of 271	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	82.9	91.0	−9%	107 of 260	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.