Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GOLDEN

IMO: 9811012
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 135,100 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 154,499 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

297

Container median 178 kg/nm (+67%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.99

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−69%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

111.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,004 t

CO₂ emitted

49,916 t

Distance sailed

53,937 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,439 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 324 kg/nm · median 177 (+83%)

78.8Ranks 2,080 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 78% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 261 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU34%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,231 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GOLDEN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GOLDEN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GOLDEN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−2%	−9%	−5%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+10%	+17%	+48%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	+10%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−11%	−18%	−16%	−13%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−3%	−5%	−0%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+0%	−2%	+7%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+1%	−4%	+0%	−1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	27,042	84,479	83,375	5,519	15.1	324	7.50	–
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	29,223	91,102	87,912	5,398	16.3	332	–	–
2023	not published	17,876	55,759	59,301	3,849	15.4	301	7.50	–
2022	not published	16,004	49,916	53,937	3,439	15.7	297	5.99	–
2021	not published	21,498	67,064	64,451	3,803	16.9	334	6.88	–
2020	not published	22,311	70,129	64,756	3,741	17.3	345	6.91	–
2019	not published	20,782	64,991	60,443	3,399	17.8	344	7.17	–
2018	not published	20,424	63,783	60,189	3,193	18.9	339	7.27	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	7.50	16.3	−54%	261 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	7.50	19.4	−61%	203 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	5.99	19.1	−69%	35 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	6.88	17.9	−62%	134 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	6.91	17.6	−61%	162 of 1,797	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	7.17	18.9	−62%	132 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B+C
2018	not published	7.27	20.2	−64%	80 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.