Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTAINERSHIPS NORD

IMO: 9813993
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,622 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.41 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG · part of Nordic Hamburg

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,804 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.5

Container median 178 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+50%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,714 t

CO₂ emitted

16,861 t

Distance sailed

66,827 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,462 h

269 days, 74% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−48%)

78.8Ranks 428 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+89%)

7.22Ranks 1,709 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports53%
From the EU31%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

5,411 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

868 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONTAINERSHIPS NORD
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTAINERSHIPS NORD
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTAINERSHIPS NORD
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+5%	+1%	−4%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	−25%	+9%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.8 kn	+9%	+37%	+9%	−6%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−5%	−8%	+36%	−9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+0%	−12%	−31%	+2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+10%	+21%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	4,827	13,987	52,672	4,304	12.2	91.7	30.8	–
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	4,795	13,982	54,775	4,333	12.6	87.5	29.2	94%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,781	19,386	73,103	5,584	13.1	92.8	26.8	95%
2022	not published	5,714	16,861	66,827	6,462	10.3	85.5	28.7	95%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,442	12,673	49,282	4,611	10.7	90.1	31.5	89%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,426	17,981	71,502	5,868	12.2	89.9	31.0	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,626	16,035	64,820	5,188	12.5	86.8	25.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	30.8	16.3	+89%	1,709 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	29.2	17.5	+66%	1,437 of 1,974	ABS	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	26.8	19.4	+38%	1,253 of 1,899	ABS	A
2022	not published	28.7	19.1	+50%	1,265 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	31.5	17.9	+76%	1,338 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	31.0	17.6	+76%	1,351 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	25.6	18.9	+36%	1,137 of 1,788	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.