Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG
Ships10
CO₂ emitted103 kt+19.9%
Fuel per mile83 kg/nm
Average speed12.3 kn
CO₂ at berth6.0%
Ships burning LNG6
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG24.8 (+52%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG624.8+52%8512.74,8126.4%6
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG9.3 (+17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG49.3+17%7210.41,6984.2%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KGDNV (10)100%0%0%0%

Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
PATAGONIA9611280Bulk carrier25.4 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+64%10.31,087 t€0
NORDIC DALIAN9667588Bulk carrier9.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+3%10.55,025 t€147k
CONTAINERSHIPS BOREALISLNG9866249Container22.1 g CO₂/t·nm22.20%13.117,251 t€505k
DALARNA9626120Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm8.0−4%11.51,661 t€0
CONTAINERSHIPS AURORALNG9814014Container20.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−6%13.014,960 t€450k
ALENTEJO9626118Bulk carrier8.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.5−7%10.28,265 t€26k
CONTAINERSHIPS NORDLNG9813993Container30.8 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−31%12.213,987 t€544k
CONTAINERSHIPS STELLARLNG9866251Container29.5 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−34%12.515,072 t€683k
CONTAINERSHIPS POLARLNG9814002Container26.6 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−41%12.112,252 t€376k
CONTAINERSHIPS ARCTICLNG9818400Container22.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−49%13.013,552 t€404k

30 of 10 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.