Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR

IMO: 9814002
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,227 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG · part of Nordic Hamburg

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,941 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.0

Container median 165 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+43%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,874 t

CO₂ emitted

16,939 t

Distance sailed

68,275 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,202 h

217 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 347 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 32% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+63%)

7.22Ranks 1,603 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU35%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

5,592 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

786 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+4%	+0%	−7%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	−22%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−0%	+14%	−3%	+7%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	−3%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+3%	−6%	−4%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	+52%	−21%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	4,294	12,252	49,864	4,115	12.1	86.1	26.6	–
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	4,399	12,698	53,378	4,224	12.6	82.4	27.4	95%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5,874	16,939	68,275	5,202	13.1	86.0	27.8	95%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6,071	17,646	70,284	6,142	11.4	86.4	26.0	94%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,222	17,612	72,723	6,341	11.5	85.5	26.2	95%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,313	17,637	76,116	6,069	12.5	83.0	25.5	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,368	12,686	50,191	3,855	13.0	87.0	32.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	26.6	16.3	+63%	1,603 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	27.4	17.5	+56%	1,392 of 1,974	ABS	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	27.8	19.4	+43%	1,282 of 1,899	ABS	A
2022LNG / alt.	not published	26.0	19.1	+36%	1,175 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	26.2	17.9	+47%	1,218 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	25.5	17.6	+45%	1,238 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	32.4	18.9	+72%	1,309 of 1,788	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.