Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTAINERSHIPS AURORA

IMO: 9814014
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,055 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG · part of Nordic Hamburg

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,055 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

75.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+27%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,421 t

CO₂ emitted

14,960 t

17,575 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,600 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,524 h

230 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 75.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 181 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 44% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.78 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+27%)

7.22Ranks 1,376 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports48%
From the EU36%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU6%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,577 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

87.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.175

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CONTAINERSHIPS AURORA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTAINERSHIPS AURORA
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTAINERSHIPS AURORA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	+22%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+1%	−8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−2%	+4%	+13%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+0%	+8%	−16%	+24%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−1%	−11%	−12%	+2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.7 kn	−27%	+63%	+470%	−41%	6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	5,421	14,960	71,600	5,524	13.0	75.7	20.78	–
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	4,879	13,965	58,739	4,570	12.9	83.1	28.29	95%
2023LNG	not published	4,944	14,193	58,191	4,666	12.5	85.0	30.76	95%
2022LNG	not published	4,452	12,957	51,409	4,365	11.8	86.6	36.32	95%
2021LNG	not published	5,289	14,954	61,315	5,596	11.0	86.3	29.35	93%
2020LNG	not published	6,055	16,959	69,342	5,674	12.2	87.3	28.78	–
2019	not published	1,462	4,377	12,171	2,232	5.5	120.2	48.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KGschaft mbH & Co.KG	20.78	16.30	+27%	1,376 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024LNG	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagemt GmbH & Co. KG	28.29	17.52	+61%	1,413 of 1,974	ABS	–
2023LNG	not published	30.76	19.40	+59%	1,362 of 1,899	ABS	A
2022LNG	not published	36.32	19.13	+90%	1,422 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021LNG	not published	29.35	17.90	+64%	1,288 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020LNG	not published	28.78	17.58	+64%	1,317 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	48.69	18.88	+158%	1,527 of 1,788	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.