Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

LE CHAMPLAIN

IMO: 9814038
Type: Passenger ship
Port of registry: Mata Utu
Technical efficiency: EEDI 22.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PONANT

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

69.8 kg/nm

Passenger median 76.3 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,217

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 1,819 (+22%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Passenger median 9.9 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,021 t

CO₂ emitted

6,479 t

6,578 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,934 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,863 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2025

Set against all 32 passenger ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.8 kg/nm · median 76.3 (−9%)

52.7Ranks 12 of 32, lowest first218.4

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.9 (+2%)

3.9Faster than 62% of passenger ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,217.01 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,819.16 (+22%)

617.57Ranks 23 of 32, lowest first31,126.52

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports49%
From the EU18%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU19%

75% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,886 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

18.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LE CHAMPLAIN
Passenger median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LE CHAMPLAIN
Passenger median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LE CHAMPLAIN
Passenger median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+11%	+15%	+18%	+139%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	−4%	−15%	−9%	−41%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	+3%	+40%	−18%	−39%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−40%	−33%	+76%	−51%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.8 kn	−5%	+54%	+9%	−36%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.4 kn	+44%	−18%	−52%	+401%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−3.9 kn	+4%	−30%	+151%	−6%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	PONANT	2,021	6,479	28,934	2,863	10.1	69.8	–	–
2024	PONANT	1,541	4,939	24,418	2,509	9.7	63.1	–	–
2023	not published	1,746	5,598	26,699	2,416	11.1	65.4	–	–
2022	not published	2,089	6,697	32,743	4,037	8.1	63.8	–	–
2021	not published	1,963	6,293	18,567	2,534	7.3	105.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,890	6,059	16,982	3,737	4.5	111.3	–	–
2019	not published	2,728	8,738	35,222	4,437	7.9	77.4	–	–
2018	not published	1,046	3,288	14,042	1,194	11.8	74.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Passenger median	vs Passenger	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PONANT	2,217.01	1,819.16	+22%	23 of 32	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	PONANT	926.07	618.41	+50%	138 of 202	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	1,574.91	625.29	+152%	168 of 202	Bureau Veritas	B
2022	not published	2,597.71	830.76	+213%	179 of 187	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	5,285.96	1,314.88	+302%	94 of 100	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	8,247.58	1,168.55	+606%	81 of 100	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	1,645.01	589.20	+179%	162 of 177	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	1,749.37	577.11	+203%	148 of 153	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.