Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG WINDSOR

IMO
9819650
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
167
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−28%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
4.99
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−45%)
Average speed
13.4 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
53.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,977 t
CO₂ emitted
22,241 t
Distance sailed
47,851 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,558 h
148 days, 41% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 190 (−3%)
152Ranks 172 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)
11.2Faster than 38% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.65 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−7%)
5.06Ranks 173 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU59%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
465 t
2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GASLOG WINDSOR
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • GASLOG WINDSOR
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • GASLOG WINDSOR
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.2 kn+3%+4%−36%+16%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.3 kn+8%+10%+4%+15%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.5 kn−34%−36%+89%−46%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.1 kn+53%+53%+39%+60%Same speed, fuel per mile up 53%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.6 kn−4%−14%−56%−8%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.5,90016,17832,0492,30213.9184––
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.8,93524,19849,7443,63413.7180––
2023LNG / alt.not published7,97722,24147,8513,55813.4167––
2022not published6,41719,15625,2611,82213.9254–37%
2021LNG / alt.not published3,0258,35018,1951,31613.8166–52%
2020LNG / alt.not published7,21720,30441,5942,70415.4174–48%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.6.657.12−7%173 of 386ABSB+C
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.5.737.39−22%89 of 312ABSB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published4.999.10−45%20 of 355ABSB+C
2022not published9.2210.4−11%163 of 379ABSB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published5.7710.5−45%30 of 289ABSB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published6.2710.7−41%14 of 267ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.