Navalyze · Container · Ship

YM WONDERLAND

IMO: 9820910
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 49,180 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.41 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation · part of Yang Ming

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 107,708 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

255

Container median 174 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−61%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,041 t

CO₂ emitted

31,315 t

Distance sailed

39,342 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,563 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 208 kg/nm · median 177 (+17%)

78.8Ranks 1,327 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 45% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−20%)

7.22Ranks 868 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU39%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,104 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YM WONDERLAND
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’192019’202020’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YM WONDERLAND
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YM WONDERLAND
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−8%	−22%	−2%	+89%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2024	−1.8 kn	+0%	−10%	−75%	+13%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−11%	−2%	+30%	−17%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	2,660	8,250	12,814	983	13.0	208	13.1	–
2024	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	2,957	9,320	13,039	856	15.2	227	6.93	–
2020	not published	11,586	36,091	51,255	3,015	17.0	226	6.15	–
2019	not published	10,041	31,315	39,342	2,563	15.4	255	7.39	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	13.1	16.3	−20%	868 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	6.93	17.5	−60%	144 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	6.15	17.6	−65%	84 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.39	18.9	−61%	152 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.