Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER GENTLE

IMO: 9820922
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 115,742 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. · part of Shoei

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 149,154 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

343

Container median 174 kg/nm (+97%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.20

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−62%)

Average speed

18.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+36%)

Fuel per day at sea

154.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,738 t

CO₂ emitted

67,984 t

Distance sailed

63,305 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,386 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 344 kg/nm · median 177 (+94%)

78.8Ranks 2,137 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 78% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 488 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU41%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,706 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVER GENTLE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVER GENTLE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVER GENTLE
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−1%	−9%	−1%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+20%	+16%	+13%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.6 kn	−3%	+14%	+6%	−10%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−18%	−31%	+15%	+0%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	+2%	−11%	−1%	−2%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+4%	+9%	−14%	+4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	25,292	78,888	73,605	4,883	15.1	344	9.26	–
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	25,866	80,647	74,335	4,533	16.4	348	–	–
2023	not published	19,123	59,660	65,839	3,889	16.9	290	6.59	–
2022	not published	18,643	58,193	62,079	4,336	14.3	300	7.34	–
2021	not published	19,747	61,615	54,097	3,174	17.0	365	7.33	–
2020	not published	19,559	61,414	54,547	2,797	19.5	359	7.49	–
2019	not published	21,738	67,984	63,305	3,386	18.7	343	7.20	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	9.26	16.3	−43%	488 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	SHOEI KISEN KAISHA, LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	6.59	19.4	−66%	114 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	7.34	19.1	−62%	170 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	7.33	17.9	−59%	160 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	7.49	17.6	−57%	205 of 1,797	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	7.20	18.9	−62%	138 of 1,788	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.