Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GANNET

IMO: 9822451
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

313

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.3

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+5%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,254 t

CO₂ emitted

33,733 t

Distance sailed

39,120 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,971 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 346 kg/nm · median 231 (+50%)

167Ranks 304 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 14.2 (−23%)

10.7Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 36.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+302%)

5.47Ranks 340 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU40%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

907 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GANNET
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+8%	+7%	−95%	+193%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.9 kn	+27%	+1%	+39%	+32%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−20%	−14%	−39%	−16%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+32%	+16%	+108%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	536	1,577	1,549	140	11.0	346	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,619	30,689	33,296	2,966	11.2	319	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,010	16,546	23,881	1,696	14.1	252	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,254	33,733	39,120	2,971	13.2	313	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,476	12,335	18,837	1,262	14.9	238	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	36.5	9.10	+302%	340 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	12.5	10.4	+20%	252 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.45	10.5	−10%	126 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.3	10.7	+5%	153 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.