Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ADRIANO KNUTSEN

IMO: 9831220
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Haugesund
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Knutsen OAS Shipping AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

165.0 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.28

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−26%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,643 t

CO₂ emitted

43,542 t

47,631 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

94,784 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,228 h

260 days, 71% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 165.0 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−13%)

152.1Ranks 80 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

11.2Faster than 77% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.28 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−26%)

5.06Ranks 59 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,260 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

128.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.094

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.7 kn	−13%	−2%	+21%	−25%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	−32%	+11%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	+121%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−28%	−11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+7%	+1%	−21%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+7%	+25%	+136%	−9%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	15,643	43,542	94,784	6,228	15.2	165.0	–	–
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	14,900	41,480	78,264	5,782	13.5	190.4	–	–
2023LNG	not published	21,446	60,589	114,657	8,061	14.2	187.0	–	–
2022LNG	not published	8,845	25,551	51,958	3,722	14.0	170.2	–	–
2021	not published	13,169	38,944	71,783	4,993	14.4	183.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	15,457	43,073	90,388	5,941	15.2	171.0	–	–
2019LNG	not published	6,102	17,434	38,235	2,922	13.1	159.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	5.28	7.12	−26%	59 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	7.02	7.39	−5%	145 of 312	Lloyd's Register	–
2023LNG	not published	6.32	9.10	−31%	74 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2022LNG	not published	5.89	10.38	−43%	37 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2021	not published	6.61	10.46	−37%	51 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2020LNG	not published	6.45	10.71	−40%	23 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2019LNG	not published	7.10	10.87	−35%	36 of 248	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.