Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ADRIANO KNUTSEN

IMO: 9831220
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Haugesund
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Knutsen OAS Shipping AS

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

184

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.61

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−37%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

63.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,169 t

CO₂ emitted

38,944 t

Distance sailed

71,783 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,993 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 165 kg/nm · median 190 (−13%)

152Ranks 80 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

11.2Faster than 77% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.28 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−26%)

5.06Ranks 59 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU40%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

296 t

0.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ADRIANO KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.7 kn	−13%	−2%	+21%	−25%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	−32%	+11%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	+121%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−28%	−11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+7%	+1%	−21%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+7%	+25%	+136%	−9%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	15,643	43,542	94,784	6,228	15.2	165	–	–
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	14,900	41,480	78,264	5,782	13.5	190	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	21,446	60,589	114,657	8,061	14.2	187	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,845	25,551	51,958	3,722	14.0	170	–	–
2021	not published	13,169	38,944	71,783	4,993	14.4	184	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15,457	43,073	90,388	5,941	15.2	171	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6,102	17,434	38,235	2,922	13.1	160	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	5.28	7.12	−26%	59 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	7.02	7.39	−5%	145 of 312	Lloyd's Register	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.32	9.10	−31%	74 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.89	10.4	−43%	37 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2021	not published	6.61	10.5	−37%	51 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6.45	10.7	−40%	23 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7.10	10.9	−35%	36 of 248	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.