Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG PHECDA

IMO: 9834313
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

207

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.54

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−47%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,146 t

CO₂ emitted

67,124 t

Distance sailed

116,503 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,804 h

284 days, 78% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 339 kg/nm · median 190 (+78%)

152Ranks 362 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 6.1 kn · median 14.4 (−58%)

11.2Faster than 0% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+54%)

5.06Ranks 318 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU57%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,168 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG PHECDA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG PHECDA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG PHECDA
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−9.4 kn	+74%	−32%	−81%	–	9.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 74%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−10%	−15%	+61%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+16%	+21%	−21%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−10%	−17%	−51%	−10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+4.9 kn	+9%	+53%	+595%	−71%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	4,725	13,015	13,938	2,299	6.1	339	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	14,192	38,600	72,756	4,682	15.5	195	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,777	27,047	45,068	2,749	16.4	217	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,606	29,361	56,792	3,602	15.8	187	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	24,146	67,124	116,503	6,804	17.1	207	–	–
2020	not published	3,203	9,945	16,771	1,380	12.2	191	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	11.0	7.12	+54%	318 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2024LNG	MOL LNG SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5.09	9.10	−44%	24 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4.99	10.4	−52%	10 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5.54	10.5	−47%	28 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	19.1	10.7	+78%	245 of 267	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.