Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

MOL
Ships89
CO₂ emitted1.5 Mt+17.9%
Fuel per mile159 kg/nm
Average speed13.7 kn
CO₂ at berth2.2%
Ships burning LNG26
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • MOL7.7 (+8%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL267.7+8%23613.83,3521.9%20
Segment median 7.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4

  • MOL64.8 (+17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL3964.8+17%9315.31,7032.1%4
Segment median 55.40%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • MOL9.1 (−44%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL69.1−44%22912.12,4452.0%–
Segment median 16.30%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • MOL13.4 (−11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL1113.4−11%7210.52,8905.6%2
Segment median 15.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • MOL15.7 (−56%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL515.7−56%11714.11,0252.7%–
Segment median 35.60%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • MOL11.0 (+38%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MOL211.0+38%15412.94125.5%–
Segment median 8.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MOLClassNK (87), DNV (4), Lloyd's Register (2)21%36%94%0%

MOL: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
WISTERIA ACE9355197Vehicle carrier671 g CO₂/t·nm158+324%8.183 t€2k
CRYSTAL ACE9539224Vehicle carrier625 g CO₂/t·nm158+294%16.54,643 t€126k
MIRACULOUS ACE9293521Vehicle carrier584 g CO₂/t·nm158+269%15.84,617 t€126k
PRECIOUS ACE9554200Vehicle carrier524 g CO₂/t·nm158+231%14.74,058 t€113k
AL WAKRAH9086746LNG carrier14.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+106%14.321,453 t€567k
OPAL ACE9539183Vehicle carrier265 g CO₂/t·nm158+68%16.15,516 t€168k
VLADIMIR RUSANOVLNG9750701LNG carrier11.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+59%14.546,328 t€1.2m
LNG PHECDALNG9834313LNG carrier11.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+54%6.113,015 t€346k
NIKOLAY URVANTSEVLNG9750660LNG carrier10.8 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+52%14.057,087 t€1.5m
VLADIMIR VIZELNG9750658LNG carrier10.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+49%14.960,505 t€1.6m
POINT FORTINLNG9375721LNG carrier10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+47%15.518,667 t€383k
EMERALD ACE9539236Vehicle carrier217 g CO₂/t·nm158+37%16.35,342 t€42k
PHOENIX ADMIRAL9482603Oil tanker11.0 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+34%12.92,577 t€71k
GALAXY ACE9624237Vehicle carrier56.1 g CO₂/t·nm43.7+28%15.46,207 t€165k
PLEIADES SPIRIT9409326Vehicle carrier95.2 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+25%14.54,695 t€124k
AL AAMRIYA9338266LNG carrier8.9 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+25%13.689,765 t€1.4m
PIGEON POINT9322396Chemical tanker14.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+23%8.05,982 t€187k
ENERGY UNIVERSELNG9758844LNG carrier8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+22%13.25,505 t€149k
FRAIHA9360817LNG carrier8.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+21%14.965,743 t€849k
MURWAB9360805LNG carrier8.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+21%12.721,912 t€558k
AQUAMARINE ACE9397987Vehicle carrier52.6 g CO₂/t·nm43.7+21%15.39,876 t€257k
ORCHID ACE9381677Vehicle carrier52.6 g CO₂/t·nm43.7+20%17.110,930 t€286k
AQUAMARINE PROGRESS9415650Gas carrier (LPG)17.3 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+20%13.17,301 t€4k
RUBY ACE9476757Vehicle carrier91.0 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+20%14.910,436 t€322k
CATTLEYA ACE9544918Vehicle carrier89.5 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+18%13.33,031 t€97k
MUSANAH9415648Gas carrier (LPG)16.9 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+17%13.14,024 t€108k
DIVINE ACE9610432Vehicle carrier64.8 g CO₂/t·nm55.4+17%16.37,480 t€223k
MOL EXPERIENCE9333838Container16.8 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+17%6.52,690 t€90k
LNG ROSENROTLNG9877133LNG carrier8.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+16%13.144,929 t€1.2m
SWIFT ACE9338838Vehicle carrier86.8 g CO₂/t·nm76.1+14%12.95,571 t€171k

30 of 107 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.