Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MINA

IMO: 9839260
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 174,688 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.12 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 162,592 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

387

Container median 172 kg/nm (+125%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.41

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−58%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

153.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,913 t

CO₂ emitted

52,666 t

Distance sailed

43,713 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,643 h

110 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 413 kg/nm · median 177 (+133%)

78.8Ranks 2,206 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 48% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−55%)

7.22Ranks 250 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU47%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,543 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MINA
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MINA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MINA
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+8%	−9%	−84%	+1%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+5%	+11%	+77%	+9%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+4.9 kn	−17%	+26%	+295%	−27%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.0 kn	−5%	−33%	−18%	−3%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	+20%	+0%	−69%	+29%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+5%	+7%	+28%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,976	15,549	12,061	911	13.2	413	7.38	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	29,343	91,415	76,587	4,903	15.6	383	7.34	–
2023	not published	15,842	49,341	43,358	2,940	14.7	365	6.75	–
2022	not published	4,821	15,026	10,964	1,124	9.8	440	9.25	–
2021	not published	6,200	19,328	13,371	969	13.8	464	9.58	–
2020	not published	16,913	52,666	43,713	2,643	16.5	387	7.41	–
2019	not published	12,629	39,434	34,119	2,106	16.2	370	7.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7.38	16.3	−55%	250 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7.34	17.5	−58%	199 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	6.75	19.4	−65%	127 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	9.25	19.1	−52%	268 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	9.58	17.9	−46%	292 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	7.41	17.6	−58%	199 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	7.16	18.9	−62%	129 of 1,788	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.