Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GLOBAL ENERGY

IMO: 9845013
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

510

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+99%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+45%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

171.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

26,489 t

CO₂ emitted

73,260 t

Distance sailed

51,955 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,700 h

154 days, 42% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 177 kg/nm · median 190 (−7%)

152Ranks 128 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

11.2Faster than 55% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.92 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−17%)

5.06Ranks 127 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU31%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,560 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOBAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0600.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOBAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

14.014.314.514.815.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GLOBAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	−67%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−16%	−18%	−6%	−21%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−53%	−50%	−34%	−49%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+40%	+39%	+123%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	1,871	5,154	10,548	721	14.6	177	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,472	18,024	32,435	2,210	14.7	200	–	60%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,182	23,159	34,381	2,287	15.0	238	–	55%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	26,489	73,260	51,955	3,700	14.0	510	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,475	23,488	23,328	1,644	14.2	363	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	5.92	7.12	−17%	127 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.09	9.10	−33%	64 of 355	ABS	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.71	10.4	−26%	120 of 379	ABS	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.2	10.5	+45%	234 of 289	ABS	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.9	10.7	+30%	203 of 267	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.