Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PACIFIC BLESSING

IMO: 9848089
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 43,605 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SSI PRIVILEGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd · part of HMM

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,605 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

87.9 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (−22%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,003 t

CO₂ emitted

6,258 t

6,356 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,779 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,957 h

82 days, 22% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 87.9 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+4%)

61.8Ranks 1,751 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 10.6 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 86% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (−22%)

4.85Ranks 812 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU40%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PACIFIC BLESSING
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

PACIFIC BLESSING
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PACIFIC BLESSING
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+2.8 kn	−1%	+31%	+106%	+2%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.1 kn	+9%	−25%	+6%	−6%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+7%	−2%	−49%	+36%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	+11%	+34%	+69%	+12%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−30%	−28%	−12%	−36%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd	2,003	6,258	22,779	1,957	11.6	87.9	6.30	–
2023	not published	982	3,076	11,031	1,257	8.8	89.0	6.17	87%
2022	not published	847	2,642	10,366	806	12.9	81.8	6.56	99%
2021	not published	1,553	4,860	20,210	1,450	13.9	76.8	4.82	92%
2020	not published	831	2,595	11,984	1,041	11.5	69.3	4.31	–
2019	not published	1,353	4,230	13,668	1,214	11.3	99.0	6.75	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd	6.30	8.09	−22%	812 of 3,089	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	6.17	8.27	−25%	830 of 3,548	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.56	8.71	−25%	956 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	4.82	8.57	−44%	239 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	4.31	8.24	−48%	148 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	6.75	8.38	−19%	991 of 3,360	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.