Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

HMM
Ships44
CO₂ emitted1.0 Mt
Fuel per mile232 kg/nm
Average speed12.7 kn
CO₂ at berth3.3%
Ships burning LNG1
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • HMM7.1 (−60%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
HMM317.1−60%24012.83,2022.9%–
Segment median 17.50%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • HMM5.1 (−36%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
HMM95.1−36%17211.41,9019.8%–
Segment median 8.10%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • HMM6.3 (−22%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
HMM36.3−22%8811.61,9572.1%–
Segment median 8.10%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • HMM8.5 (+14%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
HMM18.5+14%21112.38451.2%1
Segment median 7.40%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
HMMKorean Register (40), Lloyd's Register (4)0%0%100%0%

HMM: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
UNIVERSAL FRONTIER9829382Oil tanker6.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+37%10.98,714 t€154k
MARIA ENERGYLNG9659725LNG carrier8.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+14%12.35,881 t€89k
VL BRILLIANT9683673Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+14%10.89,501 t€158k
HYUNDAI PRESTIGE9625528Container15.6 g CO₂/t·nm14.5+7%15.77,137 t€0
POLAR ACE9721504Oil tanker4.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+5%12.82,999 t€55k
HMM BANGKOK9323510Container11.0 g CO₂/t·nm10.7+3%13.533,114 t€524k
HMM DREAM9637222Container7.1 g CO₂/t·nm7.10%14.418,981 t€307k
HYUNDAI FORCE9347566Container10.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.70%13.816,042 t€278k
UNIVERSAL PARTNER9837614Oil tanker4.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.5−4%10.724,178 t€400k
PACIFIC BLESSING9848089Bulk carrier6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.7−5%11.66,258 t€0
HMM OAKLAND9385013Container12.7 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−12%13.530,539 t€500k
HMM MIR9869198Container6.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−13%13.936,799 t€594k
POLAR BRIGHT9732395Oil tanker5.5 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−13%12.613,047 t€216k
HMM CEBU9312418Container18.8 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−14%11.817,117 t€0
HYUNDAI COURAGE9347542Container12.4 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−14%10.99,002 t€175k
HMM HANBADA9869203Container9.2 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−15%13.534,434 t€579k
HYUNDAI BRAVE9346304Container9.1 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−15%13.733,756 t€555k
HYUNDAI VOYAGER9347580Container18.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.8−15%14.812,911 t€207k
HMM LE HAVRE9868314Container5.9 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−16%13.053,141 t€858k
HMM GARAM9869186Container5.9 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−16%12.442,133 t€699k
HMM GDANSK9863326Container5.8 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−18%12.955,140 t€907k
HMM PROMISE9742168Container8.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−18%13.230,074 t€499k
HMM ROTTERDAM9868338Container5.4 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−24%12.651,191 t€864k
HYUNDAI FAITH9347554Container8.1 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−24%10.914,398 t€238k
HMM DUBLIN9863314Container5.4 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−24%13.243,533 t€770k
HMM NURI9869162Container5.4 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−24%11.028,037 t€513k
HMM SOUTHAMPTON9868340Container5.3 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−25%12.535,927 t€646k
HMM DIAMOND9944481Container8.0 g CO₂/t·nm10.7−25%12.58,640 t€155k
HMM OSLO9868326Container5.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−26%12.739,683 t€721k
HMM HELSINKI9863340Container5.2 g CO₂/t·nm7.1−26%12.135,394 t€648k

30 of 44 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.