Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ELISA LARUS

IMO: 9852975
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Gazocean SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

195

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.37

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−30%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,850 t

CO₂ emitted

35,685 t

Distance sailed

65,938 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,445 h

185 days, 51% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 212 kg/nm · median 190 (+11%)

152Ranks 250 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 14.4 (−13%)

11.2Faster than 17% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.48 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+5%)

5.06Ranks 205 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU51%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

550 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELISA LARUS
LNG carrier median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELISA LARUS
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ELISA LARUS
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+22%	+2%	−30%	+29%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	−33%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+6.1 kn	−15%	+44%	+4%	−27%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.2 kn	+30%	−4%	+140%	+66%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Gazocean SA	6,547	18,287	30,939	2,476	12.5	212	–	–
2024LNG	Gazocean SA	7,651	20,686	44,240	2,964	14.9	173	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,850	35,685	65,938	4,445	14.8	195	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,615	41,887	63,407	7,256	8.7	231	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,667	12,973	26,388	2,223	11.9	177	–	60%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Gazocean SA	7.48	7.12	+5%	205 of 386	Verifavia	B+C
2024LNG	Gazocean SA	5.80	7.39	−22%	92 of 312	Verifavia	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.37	9.10	−30%	76 of 355	Verifavia	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8.74	10.4	−16%	150 of 379	Verifavia	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5.28	10.5	−50%	21 of 289	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.