Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

COOL DISCOVERER

IMO
9861031
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Thenamaris LNG Inc · part of Thenamaris

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
182
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−21%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.99
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−23%)
Average speed
14.1 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
61.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,333 t
CO₂ emitted
43,597 t
Distance sailed
84,432 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,976 h
249 days, 68% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 154 kg/nm · median 190 (−19%)
152Ranks 42 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)
11.2Faster than 29% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.22 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−27%)
5.06Ranks 54 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU55%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
741 t
1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • COOL DISCOVERER
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • COOL DISCOVERER
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • COOL DISCOVERER
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn−2%−2%+50%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024−0.6 kn−14%−18%−15%−24%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.1 kn+3%+3%−18%+6%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−1.0 kn+2%−4%+54%+24%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGThenamaris LNG Inc16,51845,042107,1447,96513.5154––
2024LNGThenamaris LNG Inc11,21830,43171,5425,30813.5157––
2023LNG / alt.not published15,33343,59784,4325,97614.1182––
2022LNG / alt.not published18,01551,137102,6597,20814.2176––
2021LNG / alt.not published11,43732,29866,4494,38115.2172––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGThenamaris LNG Inc5.227.12−27%54 of 386RINAB+C
2024LNGThenamaris LNG Inc5.297.39−28%66 of 312RINAB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published6.999.10−23%108 of 355RINAB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published6.6110.4−36%66 of 379RINAB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published5.3210.5−49%23 of 289RINAB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.