Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

TRANSGAS FORCE

IMO
9861811
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 6.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
329
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+42%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
12.0
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+31%)
Average speed
12.6 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
99.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,139 t
CO₂ emitted
43,382 t
Distance sailed
46,093 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,667 h
153 days, 42% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 329 kg/nm · median 231 (+42%)
167Ranks 276 of 355, lowest first359
Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 14.2 (−11%)
10.7Faster than 26% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+31%)
5.47Ranks 262 of 355, lowest first17.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU60%
  • Into the EU38%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
638 t
1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • TRANSGAS FORCE
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • TRANSGAS FORCE
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • TRANSGAS FORCE
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2023−2.6 kn+16%−4%−19%+5%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023LNG / alt.not published15,13943,38246,0933,66712.6329––
2022LNG / alt.not published16,14444,97057,1053,74715.2283––
2021not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2023LNG / alt.not published12.09.10+31%262 of 355EMICERTA+C
2022LNG / alt.not published11.310.4+9%224 of 379EMICERTA+C
2021not published––––EMICERTA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.