Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ADVENTURE

IMO
9870159
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
France
Port of registry
Marseille
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Gazocean SA

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
290
LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+15%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
10.6
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+2%)
Average speed
16.2 kn
LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+15%)
Fuel per day at sea
112.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,319 t
CO₂ emitted
23,851 t
Distance sailed
28,679 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,774 h
74 days, 20% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 192 kg/nm · median 190 (+1%)
152Ranks 200 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 14.4 (+13%)
11.2Faster than 94% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.59 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−7%)
5.06Ranks 171 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
472 t
2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LNG ADVENTURE
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • LNG ADVENTURE
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • LNG ADVENTURE
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.9 kn+15%+22%+113%−42%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.5 kn−6%−3%−54%+108%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.3 kn−39%−44%+83%−48%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+2.2 kn−13%+0%+24%−6%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGGazocean SA9,80427,01051,1713,14116.3192––
2024LNGGazocean SA3,98310,81123,9691,56015.4166––
2023LNG / alt.not published9,26625,88152,5743,52314.9176––
2022LNG / alt.not published8,31923,85128,6791,77416.2290––
2021LNG / alt.not published7,74621,66923,1591,65714.0335–74%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGGazocean SA6.597.12−7%171 of 386VerifaviaB+C
2024LNGGazocean SA11.47.39+54%247 of 312VerifaviaB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published5.499.10−40%37 of 355VerifaviaB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published10.610.4+2%200 of 379VerifaviaB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published11.310.5+8%159 of 289VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.