Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ENDURANCE

IMO: 9874492
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Gazocean SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

184

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

5.44

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−40%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,400 t

CO₂ emitted

23,472 t

Distance sailed

45,740 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,115 h

130 days, 36% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 190 (−3%)

152Ranks 170 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 14.4 (−11%)

11.2Faster than 19% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.86 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+10%)

5.06Ranks 225 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU39%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

657 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ENDURANCE
LNG carrier median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ENDURANCE
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ENDURANCE
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	+11%	−9%	−29%	+31%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−10%	−4%	−61%	+10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+9%	+14%	−35%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Gazocean SA	2,295	6,296	12,470	974	12.8	184	–	–
2024LNG	Gazocean SA	2,926	8,086	17,633	1,125	15.7	166	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,400	23,472	45,740	3,115	14.7	184	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,856	32,949	70,276	4,993	14.1	169	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Gazocean SA	7.86	7.12	+10%	225 of 386	Verifavia	B+C
2024LNG	Gazocean SA	5.98	7.39	−19%	103 of 312	Verifavia	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5.44	9.10	−40%	34 of 355	Verifavia	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.61	10.4	−46%	26 of 379	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.