Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG WELLINGTON

IMO
9876660
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
178
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−23%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.27
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−31%)
Average speed
14.4 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
61.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,080 t
CO₂ emitted
22,351 t
Distance sailed
45,289 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,148 h
131 days, 36% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 190 (−5%)
152Ranks 145 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)
11.2Faster than 42% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.74 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−5%)
5.06Ranks 176 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
503 t
2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GASLOG WELLINGTON
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • GASLOG WELLINGTON
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • GASLOG WELLINGTON
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.0 kn+16%+8%+383%+98%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.7 kn−13%−8%−72%−46%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.1 kn−15%−26%−18%−16%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.11,07430,04461,4934,37214.1180––
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.1,9805,35812,73384215.1156––
2023LNG / alt.not published8,08022,35145,2893,14814.4178––
2022LNG / alt.not published11,58933,63555,2203,34316.5210–48%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.6.747.12−5%176 of 386ABSB+C
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.3.407.39−54%3 of 312ABSB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published6.279.10−31%72 of 355ABSB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published7.4710.4−28%112 of 379ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.