Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG WINCHESTER

IMO
9876737
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
184
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.44
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−29%)
Average speed
13.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−4%)
Fuel per day at sea
60.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,597 t
CO₂ emitted
23,861 t
Distance sailed
46,713 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,415 h
142 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 185 kg/nm · median 190 (−3%)
152Ranks 178 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)
11.2Faster than 56% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.05 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−15%)
5.06Ranks 140 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU52%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
492 t
2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GASLOG WINCHESTER
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • GASLOG WINCHESTER
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • GASLOG WINCHESTER
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn+9%+5%+331%+4%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.5 kn−8%+3%−74%−10%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.3 kn−7%−16%+42%+4%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.2 kn−3%−4%+184%−22%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.9,78926,53552,8923,60114.7185––
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.2,0795,64112,26580515.2170––
2023LNG / alt.not published8,59723,86146,7133,41513.7184––
2022LNG / alt.not published6,53219,24032,9132,18915.0198–66%
2021not published2,3587,08311,57275915.2204–40%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.6.057.12−15%140 of 386ABSB+C
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.5.827.39−21%95 of 312ABSB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published6.449.10−29%84 of 355ABSB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published6.1710.4−41%47 of 379ABSB+C
2021not published7.9410.5−24%90 of 289ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.