Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AVENIR ACHIEVEMENT

IMO: 9886768
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Georgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.41 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd. · part of Wilhelmsen Ship Management

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

75.1 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (−67%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

515

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+5,561%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

497 t

CO₂ emitted

1,489 t

Distance sailed

6,627 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

595 h

25 days, 7% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 75.1 kg/nm · median 230.7 (−67%)

166.5Ranks 9 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.2 (−22%)

10.7Faster than 12% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 515.12 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+5,561%)

5.47Ranks 352 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU72%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU28%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

28.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AVENIR ACHIEVEMENT
LNG carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

AVENIR ACHIEVEMENT
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+39%	+56%	+25%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	497	1,489	6,627	595	11.1	75.1	–	–
2022	not published	287	878	5,319	534	10.0	53.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	515.12	9.10	+5,561%	352 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.