Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS ITHACA

IMO
9892717
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Greece
Port of registry
Piraeus
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.69 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
163
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−29%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.03
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−34%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−8%)
Fuel per day at sea
50.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,975 t
CO₂ emitted
38,881 t
Distance sailed
85,583 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,587 h
274 days, 75% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 187 kg/nm · median 190 (−2%)
152Ranks 183 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)
11.2Faster than 27% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.33 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−11%)
5.06Ranks 154 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU54%
  • Into the EU44%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
848 t
2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MARAN GAS ITHACA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MARAN GAS ITHACA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • MARAN GAS ITHACA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn+13%+13%+35%+10%Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.3 kn+1%+4%−33%−4%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023+0.7 kn−10%−5%+153%+10%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+3.9 kn+1%+48%+202%−37%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.14,50539,58077,5775,84813.3187–99%
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.9,55126,40957,6364,34913.3166–98%
2023LNG / alt.not published13,97538,88185,5836,58713.0163––
2022LNG / alt.not published6,16917,23433,8352,75412.3182––
2021LNG / alt.not published2,0235,64911,2101,3368.4181––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.6.337.12−11%154 of 386ABSA
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.5.787.39−22%91 of 312ABSA
2023LNG / alt.not published6.039.10−34%58 of 355ABSA
2022LNG / alt.not published5.4810.4−47%22 of 379ABSA
2021LNG / alt.not published8.7210.5−17%110 of 289ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.