Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CALYPSO

IMO: 9932036
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 76,370 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 76,370 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

245.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.20

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−44%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

75.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,530 t

CO₂ emitted

12,972 t

13,888 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,462 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,446 h

60 days, 17% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 245.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+39%)

78.8Ranks 1,610 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 13.3 (−4%)

9.1Faster than 42% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−44%)

7.22Ranks 481 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU59%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU5%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,851 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

27.2 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.071

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC CALYPSO
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CALYPSO
Container median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CALYPSO
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+3.0 kn	+17%	+53%	+14%	+65%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.1 kn	−10%	−32%	+24%	−33%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	4,530	12,972	18,462	1,446	12.8	245.3	9.20	–
2024LNG	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,387	9,621	16,158	1,656	9.8	209.6	5.56	–
2023	not published	3,031	9,577	13,081	1,011	12.9	231.7	8.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	9.20	16.30	−44%	481 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5.56	17.52	−68%	32 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	8.34	19.40	−57%	268 of 1,899	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.