Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE VELLORE

IMO
9933602
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
192,465 t
Flag (estimated)
Malaysia
Port of registry
Port Kelang
Technical efficiency
EEDI 1.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd · part of MISC

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
183
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
11.8 kn
Fuel per day at sea
51.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,614 t
CO₂ emitted
7,905 t
Distance sailed
14,301 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,208 h
50 days, 14% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 129 (+36%)
76.1Ranks 1,402 of 1,665, lowest first191
Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 10.7 (+13%)
8.0Faster than 89% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 2.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−66%)
4.51Ranks 17 of 1,665, lowest first27.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports1%
  • From the EU36%
  • Into the EU54%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
1,438 t
55% of all fuel; 45% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
719 t
9.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EAGLE VELLORE
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • EAGLE VELLORE
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EAGLE VELLORE
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn+8%+4%+102%+6%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.7 kn−12%−6%+21%–0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd6,07418,03434,8332,88812.11742.6966%
2024LNGMISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd2,7858,16217,2391,37512.51622.5468%
2023not published2,6147,90514,3011,20811.8183–55%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd2.697.95−66%17 of 1,665ABSC
2024LNGMISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd2.548.06−68%13 of 1,787ABSC
2023not published––––ABS–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.