Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LORETO

IMO
9934735
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
162,159 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 172,806 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
360
Container median 165 kg/nm (+118%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
6.50
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−66%)
Average speed
14.9 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
128.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,309 t
CO₂ emitted
44,602 t
Distance sailed
39,708 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,668 h
111 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 397 kg/nm · median 177 (+124%)
78.8Ranks 2,195 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)
9.1Faster than 59% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.62 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)
7.22Ranks 283 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports11%
  • From the EU22%
  • Into the EU64%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,271 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC LORETO
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC LORETO
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC LORETO
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.3 kn+8%−1%−66%+23%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.3 kn+2%+4%+88%−4%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MSC Shipmanagement Ltd10,00531,18225,2351,81113.93977.62–
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd27,45285,53174,5284,91815.23686.21–
2023not published14,30944,60239,7082,66814.93606.50–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025MSC Shipmanagement Ltd7.6216.3−53%283 of 2,208DNVB+C
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd6.2117.5−65%81 of 1,974DNVB+C
2023not published6.5019.4−66%106 of 1,899DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.