Navalyze

Navalyze · Flags · United States

United States flag, 2025

Ships whose port of registry belongs to United States, as estimated from the THETIS-MRV reports for 2025, and the companies operating them. Each company counts only its ships under this flag.

?
?

At a glance

Ships
52
reporting to EU MRV
Emitted
551,550 t
CO₂, all ships under the flag
EU ETS allowances due
€14.4m
192,095 t of allowances at the chosen price
Largest operator: Maersk
€7.6m
16 ships, 53% of the flag's allowances

Ship types under this flag

CO₂ by segment.

  • Container352,295 t
  • Vehicle carrier98,642 t
  • Other39,677 t
  • Oil tanker22,904 t
  • Ro-ro14,425 t
  • General cargo9,254 t
  • Bulk carrier8,962 t
  • Chemical tanker5,391 t

Companies by EU ETS cost

The 12 operators with most EU ETS allowances due for their United States-flagged ships in 2025. Companies of one group are summed, as on the compare page; their ships under other flags are not counted here.

#OperatorMain segmentShipsunder United StatesCO₂emitted, totalAllowancesEU ETS costvs segment medianlower is bettervs similar-size shipssame segment, lower is better
1MaerskContainer16292,311 t€7.6m−13%+6%
2American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLCVehicle carrier882,157 t€2.4m+16%+13%
3Marine Transport ManagementContainer542,980 t€1.2m––
4US Ocean Fleet ManagementVehicle carrier843,243 t€1.2m––
5Liberty Maritime CorporationOther325,748 t€702k––
6Schuyler Line Navigation Company, LLCBulk carrier320,400 t€466k––
7OSG Ship Management IncOil tanker310,661 t€382k––
8Sealift IncGeneral cargo17,526 t€220k––
9TORMOil tanker14,128 t€109k––
10Crowley Government ServicesChemical tanker23,233 t€97k––
11Crowley Global Ship ManagementChemical tanker12,159 t€57k––
12APL Maritime LtdContainer117,004 t€0––
Show by ISM company (DoC holder) instead of group
#OperatorMain segmentShipsunder United StatesCO₂emitted, totalAllowancesEU ETS costvs segment medianlower is bettervs similar-size shipssame segment, lower is better
1Maersk Line, Limited-USAContainer16292,311 t€7.6m−13%+6%
2American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLCVehicle carrier882,157 t€2.4m+16%+13%
3Marine Transport ManagementContainer542,980 t€1.2m––
4US Ocean Fleet ManagementVehicle carrier843,243 t€1.2m––
5Liberty Maritime CorporationOther325,748 t€702k––
6Schuyler Line Navigation Company, LLCBulk carrier320,400 t€466k––
7OSG Ship Management IncOil tanker310,661 t€382k––
8Sealift IncGeneral cargo17,526 t€220k––
9TORM Tanker CorporationOil tanker14,128 t€109k––
10Crowley Government ServicesChemical tanker23,233 t€97k––
11Crowley Global Ship ManagementChemical tanker12,159 t€57k––
12APL Maritime LtdContainer117,004 t€0––
Allowances
:
EU ETS allowances due for the year, at the chosen price.
vs segment median
:
CO₂ per transport work against the median segment ship. Below 0% is better.
vs similar-size ships
:
CO₂ per transport work of the median ship, against the median ship of the same size band in its segment (whole segment where the segment has no size bands). Below 0% is better.

EU ETS allowances are not a tax: companies buy and surrender one allowance per tonne of CO₂ in scope. Figures use the 2025 phase-in share and an EUA price of €75 per tonne, which the commercial view lets you change. The flag is estimated from the port of registry; see the Flags page.