Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GNV AZZURRA

IMO: 7826790
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Naples
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

280.4 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+87%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

94.28

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−83%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,131

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+347%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

88.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,508 t

CO₂ emitted

20,550 t

20,869 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,212 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,775 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 280.4 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+87%)

69.3Ranks 399 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 15.8 (−17%)

12.0Faster than 17% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 94.28 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−83%)

66.76Ranks 67 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,131.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+347%)

48.59Ranks 360 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,550 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GNV AZZURRA
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GNV AZZURRA
Ro-pax median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GNV AZZURRA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GNV AZZURRA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+29%	+15%	−33%	–	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−10%	+6%	+30%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−0%	−0%	+22%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+29%	+17%	+249%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.2 kn	−44%	−10%	−61%	–	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+58%	+80%	−36%	+227%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 58%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−7.2 kn	−25%	−62%	−24%	−37%	7.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	6,508	20,550	23,212	1,775	13.1	280.4	–	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7,461	23,474	34,442	2,349	14.7	216.6	–	–
2023	not published	6,375	20,230	26,444	2,125	12.4	241.1	–	–
2022	not published	5,245	16,637	21,733	1,744	12.5	241.3	–	–
2021	not published	1,162	3,672	6,235	453	13.8	186.4	–	–
2020	not published	5,305	16,886	15,988	1,865	8.6	331.8	–	–
2019	not published	5,270	16,628	25,106	3,338	7.5	209.9	–	–
2018	not published	9,308	29,345	33,125	2,255	14.7	281.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	94.28	566.51	−83%	67 of 408	1,131.03	253.18	+347%	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2023	not published	126.91	680.04	−81%	71 of 386	1,454.62	233.94	+522%	DNV	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2020	not published	3,223.34	750.91	+329%	364 of 387	44.72	217.49	−79%	DNV	C
2019	not published	986.77	569.03	+73%	281 of 394	27.32	222.56	−88%	DNV	C
2018	not published	1,560.58	728.92	+114%	279 of 361	0.03	184.05	−100%	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.