Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GNV ANTARES

IMO
8503797
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Naples
Technical efficiency
EIV 42.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
PRIDE OF BRUGES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
155
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+0%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
169
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−70%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
187
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−16%)
Average speed
13.2 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−16%)
Fuel per day at sea
49.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,776 t
CO₂ emitted
33,679 t
Distance sailed
69,353 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,273 h
220 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 197 kg/nm · median 150 (+31%)
69.3Ranks 326 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)
12.0Faster than 31% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,216 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+115%)
66.8Ranks 331 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−100%)
48.6Ranks 6 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports85%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU15%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5,045 t
15.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GNV ANTARES
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • GNV ANTARES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GNV ANTARES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • GNV ANTARES
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.1 kn−11%−12%−14%+129,234%Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.1 kn−1%−2%+9%−100%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023−1.6 kn+14%+3%−1%−5%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.2 kn−17%−15%+19%+17%Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+1.8 kn+33%+49%−15%+68%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.7 kn+13%+20%−32%+285%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.8 kn−1%−7%−4%−84%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa8,62527,51843,8353,11214.1197––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa11,26135,37651,0663,58914.2221––
2023not published10,51632,92247,0063,29614.3224––
2022not published9,28629,17447,4592,98415.9196––
2021not published9,33029,48039,7872,53915.7235––
2020not published8,29226,20847,0673,37413.9176––
2019not published10,77633,67969,3535,27313.2155––
2018not published11,33935,32872,5755,16814.0156––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa1,216567+115%331 of 4080.09253−100%RINAA+B
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa0.94547−100%6 of 4040.94233−100%RINAA+B
2023not published1,222680+80%316 of 38664.3234−73%RINAA+B
2022not published1,280626+104%328 of 39465.3253−74%RINAA
2021not published1,090815+34%245 of 37713.7226−94%RINAA
2020not published650751−13%176 of 387196217−10%DNVB+C
2019not published169569−70%102 of 394187223−16%DNVB+C
2018not published1,076729+48%233 of 361–––DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.