Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GNV ALLEGRA

IMO
8506311
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Genoa
Technical efficiency
EIV 30.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB
Former names
OSCAR WILDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
183.3 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+22%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
898
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+59%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
0.12
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−100%)
Average speed
16.3 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
71.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,470 t
CO₂ emitted
26,728 t
27,144 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
46,206 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,829 h
118 days, 32% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 183.3 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+22%)
69.3Ranks 301 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 15.8 (+3%)
12.0Faster than 56% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 898.04 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+59%)
66.76Ranks 275 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−100%)
48.59Ranks 8 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports80%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU20%

78% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,742 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
19.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.4 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • GNV ALLEGRA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • GNV ALLEGRA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GNV ALLEGRA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • GNV ALLEGRA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn+1%−1%−11%+36,258%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.9 kn+1%−4%−23%−100%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.2 kn+0%+1%+11%−15%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−0.5 kn+8%+6%+99%+40%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.1 kn−3%−3%+3%−21%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.2 kn−13%−12%−37%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.4 kn+16%+26%−48%+44,803%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa8,47026,72846,2062,82916.3183.3––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa9,41729,62852,0973,11516.7180.8––
2023not published12,14638,09567,8953,84917.6178.9––
2022not published10,96634,42561,3303,51617.4178.8––
2021not published5,09816,12130,8821,72617.9165.1––
2020not published5,11116,03529,9421,68217.8170.7––
2019not published9,30729,13147,5112,70317.6195.9––
2018not published15,34448,38991,0345,61116.2168.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa898.04566.51+59%275 of 4080.12253.18−100%RINAA+B
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa2.47546.68−100%19 of 4042.47232.85−99%RINAA+B
2023not published903.94680.04+33%243 of 386150.17233.94−36%RINAA+B
2022not published1,063.69626.32+70%282 of 394185.86252.90−27%RINAA+B
2021not published760.29815.19−7%180 of 377415.04226.00+84%RINAA+B
2020not published956.68750.91+27%216 of 387170.05217.49−22%RINAA+B
2019not published1,037.27569.03+82%296 of 394118.23222.56−47%RINAA+B
2018not published2.31728.92−100%18 of 3613.04184.05−98%Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.