Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

AL ANDALUS EXPRESS

IMO
8512152
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Cyprus
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EIV 36.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
132
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−15%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
326
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−43%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
369
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+66%)
Average speed
15.9 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
50.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,695 t
CO₂ emitted
24,056 t
Distance sailed
58,228 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,658 h
152 days, 42% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 150 (+18%)
69.3Ranks 282 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 15.8 (−10%)
12.0Faster than 31% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 83.1 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−85%)
66.8Ranks 56 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 531 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+110%)
48.6Ranks 281 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports85%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU15%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,505 t
14.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AL ANDALUS EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • AL ANDALUS EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • AL ANDALUS EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • AL ANDALUS EXPRESS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.7 kn−2%+12%+33%−83%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−2.7 kn+1%−17%−32%+34%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.0 kn+22%+15%+12%+51%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.6 kn+3%+7%+35%−28%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021+2.3 kn+0%+17%+25%−27%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.6 kn+8%−10%−66%+39%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.2 kn−1%−2%+23%−10%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.5,96818,56033,5662,36214.2178––
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.4,57314,35225,3032,02812.5181––
2023not published6,67720,90837,2182,44815.2179––
2022not published4,91115,30333,3682,06116.2147––
2021not published3,52110,98524,6431,58515.6143––
2020not published2,8038,82919,7001,47713.3142––
2019not published7,69524,05658,2283,65815.9132––
2018not published6,34219,85147,4962,94716.1134––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.83.1567−85%56 of 408531253+110%RINAB
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.479547−12%192 of 404471233+102%RINAB
2023not published358680−47%121 of 386404234+73%RINAA
2022not published237626−62%110 of 394349253+38%RINAA
2021not published328815−60%122 of 377588226+160%RINAA
2020not published452751−40%135 of 387551217+153%RINAA
2019not published326569−43%132 of 394369223+66%RINAA
2018not published362729−50%124 of 361362184+97%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.