Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MEGA VICTORIA

IMO: 8601915
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AMORELLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Forship SpA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

150

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

136

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−76%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

411

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+85%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,706 t

CO₂ emitted

55,792 t

Distance sailed

118,000 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,543 h

314 days, 86% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 150 kg/nm · median 150 (+0%)

69.3Ranks 205 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 15.8 (−4%)

12.0Faster than 41% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 72.2 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−87%)

66.8Ranks 43 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 740 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+192%)

48.6Ranks 308 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,221 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MEGA VICTORIA
Ro-pax median

145.0150.0155.0160.0165.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MEGA VICTORIA
Ro-pax median

14.014.515.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MEGA VICTORIA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MEGA VICTORIA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−10%	−7%	+2%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+4%	+8%	+30%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+3%	−5%	−27%	−31%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	−41%	−8%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	+14%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−11%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+0%	+0%	+3%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Forship SpA	10,287	32,929	68,462	4,496	15.2	150	–	–
2024	Forship SpA	11,178	34,963	67,306	4,534	14.8	166	–	–
2023	not published	8,297	25,915	51,917	3,626	14.3	160	–	–
2022	not published	10,930	35,043	70,800	4,555	15.5	154	–	–
2021	not published	18,359	58,657	120,001	7,587	15.8	153	–	–
2020	not published	15,486	48,796	104,999	6,837	15.4	148	–	–
2019	not published	17,706	55,792	118,000	7,543	15.6	150	–	–
2018	not published	17,224	54,273	114,999	7,368	15.6	150	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Forship SpA	72.2	567	−87%	43 of 408	740	253	+192%	RINA	C
2024	Forship SpA	87.9	547	−84%	61 of 404	810	233	+248%	RINA	C
2023	not published	92.9	680	−86%	53 of 386	867	234	+270%	RINA	C
2022	not published	135	626	−78%	86 of 394	544	253	+115%	RINA	C
2021	not published	147	815	−82%	83 of 377	381	226	+69%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	152	751	−80%	88 of 387	379	217	+74%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	136	569	−76%	95 of 394	411	223	+85%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	133	729	−82%	80 of 361	407	184	+121%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.