Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GNV ATLAS

IMO
8712520
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Naples
Technical efficiency
EEXI 28.13 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
146.2 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−3%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
386
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−32%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
687
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+171%)
Average speed
15.4 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−3%)
Fuel per day at sea
53.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,930 t
CO₂ emitted
34,975 t
35,511 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
74,762 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,863 h
203 days, 56% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 146.2 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−3%)
69.3Ranks 188 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)
12.0Faster than 43% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 385.95 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−32%)
66.76Ranks 161 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 686.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+171%)
48.59Ranks 304 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports10%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU45%
  • At berth in the EU4%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,839 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.6 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • GNV ATLAS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • GNV ATLAS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GNV ATLAS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • GNV ATLAS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn−0%−3%−24%−91%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024+0.0 kn−13%−13%+12%+10,336%Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.0 kn+2%+2%+2%−4%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+5.4 kn−20%+21%+75%−53%5.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−5.2 kn+29%−13%−44%−94%5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.4 kn−3%+7%−9%+88%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.2 kn−12%−24%+33%−33%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED10,93034,97574,7624,86315.4146.2––
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd14,50745,24699,0026,27915.8146.5––
2023not published14,78546,65388,0045,56215.8168.0––
2022not published14,30745,16386,6695,47615.8165.1––
2021not published10,25232,43549,4504,73610.4207.3––
2020not published14,16144,67188,0755,66015.6160.8––
2019not published16,00750,44996,8256,83214.2165.3––
2018not published13,76643,15773,0404,45716.4188.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED385.95566.51−32%161 of 408686.59253.18+171%DNVC
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd4,352.02546.68+696%381 of 404759.02232.85+226%DNVC
2023not published41.70680.04−94%22 of 386782.72233.94+235%DNVC
2022not published43.36626.32−93%24 of 394859.93252.90+240%DNVC
2021not published91.71815.19−89%58 of 377699.98226.00+210%DNVC
2020not published1,439.48750.91+92%281 of 38732.59217.49−85%DNVC
2019not published766.64569.03+35%236 of 39430.97222.56−86%DNVA
2018not published1,144.95728.92+57%239 of 3610.09184.05−100%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

GNV ATLAS (IMO 8712520): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze