Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

LINK GALAXY

IMO: 8820860
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,841 t
Port of registry: åKrehamn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: EXPORTER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Norwest Ship Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,841 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

42.4 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

73.90

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−22%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,332 t

CO₂ emitted

7,477 t

7,592 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

54,960 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,960 h

207 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.4 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−59%)

56.6Ranks 12 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.4 (−23%)

10.9Faster than 11% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 73.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−22%)

47.35Ranks 72 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,477 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LINK GALAXY
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LINK GALAXY
Ro-ro median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LINK GALAXY
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−8%	−10%	−3%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−1%	−4%	−3%	+5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+13%	+10%	−6%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−15%	−16%	−14%	−39%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−5%	−15%	−13%	+3%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−0%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−8%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Norwest Ship Management AS	2,332	7,477	54,960	4,960	11.1	42.4	73.90	–
2024	Norwest Ship Management AS	2,606	8,355	56,516	4,984	11.3	46.1	77.70	–
2023	not published	2,705	8,671	58,298	4,993	11.7	46.4	73.93	–
2022	not published	2,551	8,177	62,023	5,194	11.9	41.1	64.68	–
2021	not published	3,481	11,160	72,039	5,957	12.1	48.3	106.72	–
2020	not published	4,215	13,515	82,703	6,173	13.4	51.0	103.73	–
2019	not published	4,142	13,280	83,051	6,278	13.2	49.9	93.98	–
2018	not published	4,427	14,192	90,223	7,007	12.9	49.1	86.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Norwest Ship Management AS	73.90	95.19	−22%	72 of 235	DNV	A
2024	Norwest Ship Management AS	77.70	97.53	−20%	77 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	73.93	108.62	−32%	58 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	64.68	90.62	−29%	47 of 223	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	106.72	103.64	+3%	116 of 219	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	103.73	102.77	+1%	122 of 238	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	93.98	90.89	+3%	145 of 271	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	86.69	91.03	−5%	118 of 260	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.