Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

LINK NOVA

IMO: 8911748
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,778 t
Port of registry: åKrehamn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: SHIPPER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Norwest Ship Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,778 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

42.2 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

76.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−20%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−25%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,296 t

CO₂ emitted

7,362 t

7,475 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

54,359 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,020 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.2 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−60%)

56.6Ranks 10 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 14.4 (−25%)

10.9Faster than 10% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 76.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−20%)

47.35Ranks 78 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,362 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LINK NOVA
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LINK NOVA
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LINK NOVA
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−5%	+4%	+13%	−17%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.8 kn	−8%	−33%	−38%	−80%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	+1%	+20%	+43%	+137%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−4%	−10%	−32%	+84%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+2%	−6%	−6%	+3%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−1%	−4%	+3%	+9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	−12%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Norwest Ship Management AS	2,296	7,362	54,359	5,020	10.8	42.2	76.19	–
2024part-year	Rederi Ab Eckero	258	820	5,164	414	12.5	49.9	584.90	–
2024	Norwest Ship Management AS	2,119	6,787	47,959	4,802	10.0	44.2	92.10	–
2023	not published	3,689	11,530	77,189	5,589	13.8	47.8	457.28	–
2022	not published	2,550	7,999	53,903	4,627	11.6	47.3	192.62	–
2021	not published	3,903	12,512	79,504	6,435	12.4	49.1	104.68	–
2020	not published	4,091	13,114	84,784	6,354	13.3	48.2	101.56	–
2019	not published	4,017	12,879	82,384	5,997	13.7	48.8	92.81	–
2018	not published	4,790	15,356	93,705	6,822	13.7	51.1	91.03	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Norwest Ship Management AS	76.19	95.19	−20%	78 of 235	DNV	C
2024part-year	Rederi Ab Eckero	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C
2024	Norwest Ship Management AS	92.10	97.53	−6%	100 of 220	DNV	C
2023	not published	457.28	108.62	+321%	207 of 221	Verifavia	B+C
2022	not published	192.62	90.62	+113%	182 of 223	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	104.68	103.64	+1%	113 of 219	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	101.56	102.77	−1%	117 of 238	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	92.81	90.89	+2%	141 of 271	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	91.03	91.03	+0%	131 of 260	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.