Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ASMAR

IMO: 8918708
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Saint Kitts and Nevis
Port of registry: Basseterre
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.95 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PITZTAL, HEBA M

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mediterranean Line Inc

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,652 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

56.1

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

66.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (+207%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−31%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

594 t

CO₂ emitted

1,857 t

Distance sailed

10,587 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,417 h

59 days, 16% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 53.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+51%)

17.4Ranks 1,933 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 9.3 (−15%)

6.9Faster than 20% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 43.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+71%)

10.2Ranks 2,325 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU43%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

369 t

19.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ASMAR
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ASMAR
General cargo median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ASMAR
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+4.1 kn	−13%	+77%	+137%	−6%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	+27%	−19%	−52%	+34%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−13%	−31%	−24%	−48%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−1.2 kn	+14%	−1%	−41%	+107%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.7 kn	−15%	+46%	+15%	−7%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.9 kn	−0%	−54%	−61%	−10%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Mediterranean Line Inc	488	1,536	9,163	1,155	7.9	53.2	–	–
2024	Mediterranean Line Inc	238	748	3,867	1,007	3.8	61.5	–	–
2023	not published	392	1,231	8,053	1,335	6.0	48.6	–	–
2022	not published	594	1,857	10,587	1,417	7.5	56.1	66.1	–
2020	not published	885	2,799	18,068	2,088	8.7	49.0	40.6	–
2019	not published	908	2,850	15,729	3,126	5.0	57.7	44.5	–
2018	not published	2,304	7,386	39,882	3,659	10.9	57.8	38.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Mediterranean Line Inc	43.5	25.5	+71%	2,325 of 2,723	Verifavia	B
2024	Mediterranean Line Inc	46.5	19.3	+141%	1,034 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	34.6	20.7	+67%	903 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	66.1	21.6	+207%	983 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	31.9	24.5	+30%	845 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	34.2	25.0	+37%	846 of 1,154	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	38.0	24.9	+53%	811 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.