Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SPLENDID

IMO
9015747
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 25.55 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
198
Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
992
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+46%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
66.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−72%)
Average speed
18.2 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
86.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
18,027 t
CO₂ emitted
56,226 t
Distance sailed
91,233 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,008 h
209 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 217 kg/nm · median 150 (+45%)
69.3Ranks 353 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 17.3 kn · median 15.8 (+9%)
12.0Faster than 65% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 940 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+66%)
66.8Ranks 286 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−100%)
48.6Ranks 6 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports63%
  • From the EU13%
  • Into the EU14%
  • At berth in the EU10%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5,741 t
10.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SPLENDID
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • SPLENDID
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SPLENDID
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • SPLENDID
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.8 kn+6%+11%−7%+78,870%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−1.7 kn+3%−6%−32%−100%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.2 kn−9%−10%+56%+4%Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+1.3 kn+4%+12%−9%−14%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn−4%−9%+45%−31%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.8 kn+16%+12%−51%+83%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.7 kn−7%−10%−11%−34%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa12,60739,47058,0853,36017.3217––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa12,71739,76462,1723,76316.5205––
2023not published18,02756,22691,2335,00818.2198––
2022not published12,70739,87458,4443,18118.4217––
2021not published13,33442,05063,9093,73517.1209––
2020not published9,55329,82643,9322,43718.0217––
2019not published16,60351,79488,8534,73718.8187––
2018not published20,00562,449100,0975,13519.5200––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa940567+66%286 of 4080.09253−100%RINAA+B
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa1.19547−100%9 of 4041.19233−99%RINAA+B
2023not published992680+46%265 of 38666.4234−72%RINAA+B
2022not published952626+52%259 of 394106253−58%RINAA+B
2021not published1,101815+35%248 of 37773.3226−68%RINAA+B
2020not published1,595751+112%298 of 38769.2217−68%RINAA+B
2019not published871569+53%253 of 39476.1223−66%RINAA+B
2018not published1,317729+81%257 of 36159.2184−68%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.