Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

KONG HARALD

IMO: 9039119
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: TromsØ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

58.1 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

565

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

566

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+123%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,192 t

CO₂ emitted

16,647 t

16,901 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

89,382 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,642 h

277 days, 76% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 58.1 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−61%)

69.3Ranks 29 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 15.8 (−15%)

12.0Faster than 24% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 565.19 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−0%)

66.76Ranks 203 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 565.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+123%)

48.59Ranks 286 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,647 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−12%	−10%	+8%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+37%	−11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−17%	−12%	+0%	−14%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−32%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+10%	+15%	+124%	+15%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−1%	−10%	−56%	+110%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−3%	−6%	+1%	−5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,192	16,647	89,382	6,642	13.5	58.1	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,480	17,569	82,988	6,298	13.2	66.0	–	–
2023	not published	3,937	12,622	60,454	4,407	13.7	65.1	–	–
2022	not published	4,737	15,185	60,310	4,707	12.8	78.5	–	–
2021LNG	not published	7,189	19,168	88,505	6,976	12.7	81.2	–	–
2020	not published	2,922	9,369	39,481	3,274	12.1	74.0	–	–
2019	not published	6,691	21,451	89,250	6,740	13.2	75.0	–	–
2018	not published	6,842	21,935	88,076	6,521	13.5	77.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	565.19	566.51	−0%	203 of 408	565.70	253.18	+123%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	612.48	546.68	+12%	217 of 404	885.43	232.85	+280%	DNV	C
2023	not published	690.66	680.04	+2%	200 of 386	1,161.17	233.94	+396%	DNV	C
2022	not published	805.82	626.32	+29%	226 of 394	534.76	252.90	+111%	DNV	C
2021LNG	not published	1,466.46	815.19	+80%	307 of 377	395.31	226.00	+75%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,271.64	750.91	+69%	260 of 387	524.97	217.49	+141%	DNV	C
2019	not published	605.38	569.03	+6%	209 of 394	308.20	222.56	+38%	DNV	C
2018	not published	637.93	728.92	−12%	170 of 361	962.48	184.05	+423%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.