Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

KONG HARALD

IMO: 9039119
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

75.0

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

605

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

308

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+38%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,691 t

CO₂ emitted

21,451 t

Distance sailed

89,250 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,740 h

281 days, 77% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.1 kg/nm · median 150 (−61%)

69.3Ranks 29 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 15.8 (−15%)

12.0Faster than 24% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 565 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−0%)

66.8Ranks 203 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 566 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+123%)

48.6Ranks 286 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,452 t

11.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

KONG HARALD
Ro-pax median

5007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−12%	−10%	+8%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+37%	−11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−17%	−12%	+0%	−14%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−32%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+10%	+15%	+124%	+15%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−1%	−10%	−56%	+110%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−3%	−6%	+1%	−5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,192	16,647	89,382	6,642	13.5	58.1	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,480	17,569	82,988	6,298	13.2	66.0	–	–
2023	not published	3,937	12,622	60,454	4,407	13.7	65.1	–	–
2022	not published	4,737	15,185	60,310	4,707	12.8	78.5	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7,189	19,168	88,505	6,976	12.7	81.2	–	–
2020	not published	2,922	9,369	39,481	3,274	12.1	74.0	–	–
2019	not published	6,691	21,451	89,250	6,740	13.2	75.0	–	–
2018	not published	6,842	21,935	88,076	6,521	13.5	77.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	565	567	−0%	203 of 408	566	253	+123%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	612	547	+12%	217 of 404	885	233	+280%	DNV	C
2023	not published	691	680	+2%	200 of 386	1,161	234	+396%	DNV	C
2022	not published	806	626	+29%	226 of 394	535	253	+111%	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,466	815	+80%	307 of 377	395	226	+75%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,272	751	+69%	260 of 387	525	217	+141%	DNV	C
2019	not published	605	569	+6%	209 of 394	308	223	+38%	DNV	C
2018	not published	638	729	−12%	170 of 361	962	184	+423%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.