Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

RICHARD WITH

IMO: 9040429
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

74.4

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,293

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

621

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+186%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,622 t

CO₂ emitted

14,818 t

Distance sailed

62,111 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,077 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 59.0 kg/nm · median 150 (−61%)

69.3Ranks 32 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 15.8 (−17%)

12.0Faster than 17% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 670 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+18%)

66.8Ranks 225 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 846 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+234%)

48.6Ranks 325 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,451 t

9.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RICHARD WITH
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RICHARD WITH
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

RICHARD WITH
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

RICHARD WITH
Ro-pax median

4006008001,0001,2001,400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−9%	−4%	+6%	−3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−11%	−3%	+22%	−10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−3%	−13%	+120%	−26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	−63%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−1%	+5%	+39%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+0%	−9%	−31%	+94%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+9%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,297	16,965	89,696	6,852	13.1	59.0	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	5,480	17,570	84,663	6,802	12.4	64.7	–	–
2023	not published	5,024	16,106	69,319	6,072	11.4	72.5	–	–
2022	not published	2,354	7,547	31,560	2,470	12.8	74.6	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,342	13,867	86,344	6,671	12.9	73.5	–	–
2020	not published	4,622	14,818	62,111	5,077	12.2	74.4	–	–
2019	not published	6,652	21,326	89,757	6,691	13.4	74.1	–	–
2018	not published	6,224	19,953	82,009	6,292	13.0	75.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	670	567	+18%	225 of 408	846	253	+234%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	690	547	+26%	232 of 404	920	233	+295%	DNV	C
2023	not published	770	680	+13%	219 of 386	942	234	+303%	DNV	C
2022	not published	1,038	626	+66%	271 of 394	774	253	+206%	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,204	815	+48%	269 of 377	373	226	+65%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,293	751	+72%	264 of 387	621	217	+186%	DNV	C
2019	not published	668	569	+17%	224 of 394	265	223	+19%	DNV	C
2018	not published	719	729	−1%	180 of 361	926	184	+403%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.