Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORDLYS

IMO: 9048914
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: TromsØ
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

71.2

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

660

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

870

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+373%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,042 t

CO₂ emitted

19,371 t

Distance sailed

84,798 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,575 h

274 days, 75% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.6 kg/nm · median 150 (−61%)

69.3Ranks 31 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 23% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 649 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+15%)

66.8Ranks 219 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 1,099 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+334%)

48.6Ranks 357 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,375 t

12.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDLYS
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDLYS
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDLYS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NORDLYS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.6 kn	−31%	−21%	−11%	−30%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−18%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+18%	+6%	−14%	+15%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+28%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	+106%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	+10%	+20%	−61%	+1,282%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−6%	−14%	−4%	−89%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	3,075	9,858	52,499	3,936	13.3	58.6	–	–
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	4,989	15,994	58,689	5,036	11.7	85.0	–	–
2023	not published	6,167	19,772	71,800	6,177	11.6	85.9	–	–
2022	not published	6,054	19,409	83,469	6,390	13.1	72.5	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,901	11,477	65,271	5,017	13.0	75.1	–	–
2020	not published	2,314	7,420	31,725	2,445	13.0	73.0	–	–
2019	not published	5,423	17,387	81,444	6,895	11.8	66.6	–	–
2018	not published	6,042	19,371	84,798	6,575	12.9	71.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	649	567	+15%	219 of 408	1,099	253	+334%	DNV	C
2024	HURTIGRUTEN COASTAL AS	930	547	+70%	275 of 404	1,126	233	+384%	DNV	C
2023	not published	932	680	+37%	246 of 386	1,034	234	+342%	DNV	C
2022	not published	814	626	+30%	229 of 394	545	253	+115%	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,366	815	+68%	291 of 377	408	226	+81%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,037	751	+38%	225 of 387	588	217	+171%	DNV	C
2019	not published	75.1	569	−87%	61 of 394	1,834	223	+724%	DNV	C
2018	not published	660	729	−9%	174 of 361	870	184	+373%	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.