Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL KHOR

IMO: 9085613
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd · part of NYK

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

348

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+40%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

123.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,778 t

CO₂ emitted

31,156 t

Distance sailed

30,995 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,088 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 302 kg/nm · median 190 (+58%)

152Ranks 327 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.4 (−5%)

11.2Faster than 34% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+115%)

5.06Ranks 342 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

779 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL KHOR
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL KHOR
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL KHOR
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−66%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	−17%	−23%	+117%	+4%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+8%	−1%	+55%	−9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	6,870	19,459	22,773	1,663	13.7	302	–	–
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	19,469	56,689	67,226	4,908	13.7	290	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,778	31,156	30,995	2,088	14.8	348	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6,475	18,828	20,022	1,246	16.1	323	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	15.3	7.12	+115%	342 of 386	ClassNK	A+C
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	13.2	7.39	+79%	262 of 312	ClassNK	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12.7	9.10	+40%	278 of 355	ClassNK	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13.9	10.4	+34%	280 of 379	ClassNK	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.