Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MEGA EXPRESS FOUR

IMO
9086590
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Italy
Port of registry
Genova
Technical efficiency
EIV 5.66 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Forship SpA

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
185
Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+18%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
74.3
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−90%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
885
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+307%)
Average speed
16.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
73.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,697 t
CO₂ emitted
39,644 t
Distance sailed
68,769 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,142 h
173 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 150 (+16%)
69.3Ranks 276 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)
12.0Faster than 42% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 81.3 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−86%)
66.8Ranks 53 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 784 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+210%)
48.6Ranks 315 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports99%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
523 t
1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MEGA EXPRESS FOUR
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • MEGA EXPRESS FOUR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MEGA EXPRESS FOUR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MEGA EXPRESS FOUR
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.3 kn−7%−15%−12%−5%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.7 kn−0%+4%+3%+12%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.4 kn−3%−16%+1%−5%2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.6 kn−6%−3%−9%−2%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+1.1 kn+12%+19%+29%+11%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020−1.2 kn−9%−15%−22%−17%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−1.9 kn−7%−16%+1%−12%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Forship SpA12,91341,31874,3124,84815.3174––
2024Forship SpA15,78449,29784,2215,06516.6187––
2023not published15,34747,91381,5315,11415.9188––
2022not published15,62148,75180,6894,39818.3194––
2021not published18,29457,18588,8215,01017.7206––
2020not published12,69739,64468,7694,14216.6185––
2019not published17,75555,40287,9534,93817.8202––
2018not published18,97859,18686,9644,41419.7218––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Forship SpA81.3567−86%53 of 408784253+210%RINAC
2024Forship SpA86.0547−84%59 of 404914233+292%RINAC
2023not published76.6680−89%40 of 386858234+267%RINAC
2022not published80.5626−87%50 of 394852253+237%RINAA
2021not published82.2815−90%51 of 377890226+294%RINAC
2020not published74.3751−90%55 of 387885217+307%RINAA
2019not published89.0569−84%70 of 3941,020223+358%RINAC
2018not published101729−86%65 of 3611,089184+492%RINAC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.